Forum thread devolves into insults and cat memes over OP behavior

The lesson here is clear. Listen to the elders or the forum will name you Ken and roast you with laughter.

Go ahead, though my replies may be slow. I start new employee orientation tomorrow for a role I've already been doing across multiple leadership changes. I've spent weeks fixing processes so things aren't constant survival mode, but now I get the full eight-hour mission and vision session. I expect to be even more tired by the end of the day.

OP was last seen at 9:52am EST so the last post visible to them was the strong closer from that user. They still don't know they've been named Ken. If you spot them around, give a hearty howdy and let them know.

That's the reason. Look at the mess you kicked off? I'm over here staying out of it with my hands neatly together.

Looks like the original poster hasn't said anything since Tuesday, though they checked in yesterday morning.

A few folks skip reading the whole thing or can't spot the real problems underneath. Or maybe you just want the spotlight?

I'm definitely not going to turn you into a star. You're on your own with this, buddy.

Keeping things sterile is tough even when beginning with something already sterile and working only under a laminar flow hood. I can't see how sterility holds up without starting from a clean source. You'd also need a clean room to handle the processing. This discussion seems to have struck a nerve with many people just like questions about using plain tap water for reconstituting. Sure, it might turn out fine most times... but then there's that one instance where it leads to everyone getting ill.

JourneyToPerfection had a solid comparison earlier, and here's my weaker version. Ken: I'm considering leaping from a cliff. Parachute pants and batwing sleeves might work as a homemade wingsuit. Us: Stop! That's risky. You should look into why it's dangerous. We can point you to ways to research why this is a terrible plan. Ken: But both have extra material, so I figure you all are wrong. Us: Please, go research the reasons this won't work!!! You'll get injured!!! The science doesn't add up! No one in the gliding scene tries this. Don't jump wearing an MC Hammer getup!!! Ken: But nobody has handed me the basic details I need, and I've already looked without finding this discussed. Why won't you give me a full physics lesson? Why must I study it myself? You all are dumb and don't get fabric. Us: It's been covered. We've shown you where to find the details. And now we're finished with you.

This right here is precisely the reason I hold off signing a thread until it's truly over. Because every so often there's a brief pause and suddenly someone new jumps in.

Well, Cat happens to be female, so there's that... 😎

The issue with certain individuals is they won't let facts or basic sense interfere. They're more focused on seeming right than actually being accurate. It became clear what we had on our hands when the early replies were full of insults. Something I figured out years back:

I really wish you'd show all of us to be mistaken. I'd enjoy getting GHK-cu cheap. But chances aren't looking good for that. 50 to 1 odds? Best of luck. (I'll bet 50 on the community veterans)

Have you come across bulk bags of injectable GHK-Cu that are easy to find?

That accounts for more than just why you might have avoided COVID. Are we redoing things and sending samples off for checks now? How do those powder vials keep appearing in those shots on my third-party certificates? What's Jano hiding from me and others who've viewed a Jano certificate, even edited ones? Plus, we don't believe anyone besides us cares about what goes into our bodies. That's the point of testing.

No. Bulk bags of peptide powder that you or I can get aren't meant for injection. They're typically for topical use in powder form. That's exactly why I, as the second person to reply to the OP, brought up the cosmetic grade. Appreciate you backing up my initial surprise.

I think you ought to go ahead and try it to show we're mistaken! Don't hold back! Step up as the test subject.

Oh dear, don't push for that. Let's hope nothing bad occurs to them. Someone out there could actually attempt it.

No issues here, ma'am. I'm content and without worries.

Hmm, perhaps my comparison wasn't explained clearly enough for folks to follow. And that's fine 😊 I'll give it another go. GHK powder might indeed be over 99% pure. But that alone doesn't make it okay to inject. The reason is topical powder isn't made, handled or packaged under the sterile setup used for injectable versions. With a bag of it, I could stick my hand inside, leave it in sunlight, or keep it open while preparing a topical mix, letting in dust, pet hair and tiny particles. Even then, turning it into a lotion for skin use would be safe. Knowing this, makers realize that exposure won't harm the buyer using it topically. So production is simpler with fewer sterility rules. Maybe your home mixing method...

Because we completely trust what the sellers put on their certificates, right?

Though mold gets turned into penicillin sometimes. How would it feel if you said don't inject mold and I argued back? Then someone shows up insulting you and others who are warning against it. This is my final try...

Which tests on that clean certificate make you sure it's safe to inject?

This joker is just the same one in another silly vehicle.

I told you all ahead of time...

Obviously, kid, you don't get what true worth is.

But aren't you doing the same? What have you actually contributed here?