The discussion has shifted entirely to personal attacks labeling the OP an idiot and troll, with users sharing cat photos and memes while debating whether to ignore or engage further. Safety aspects of the original query are dismissed as irrelevant, and participants contrast the OP unfavorably with other contributors. The thread frames the situation as entertainment rather than substantive exchange, with some users blocking others.
What this discussion establisheswhether to continue addressing the OP or fully drop the thread
Still openany resolution on handling similar persistent posters
Nothing here is advice.
A couple sites offer big bulk bags of this stuff. I figure it's the exact same material sold in vials. Is there something I'm overlooking here? Planning to get it tested but wondering if anyone else has tried pinning it.
Haven't come across anyone pinning raw cosmetic grade so far. Let me know if you go ahead with it?
This is nuts I would never mark the beauty level version. How did everything turn so weird.
It needs a special process to make it safe for injection. Please do not inject anything from a bag or big box store. You're asking for an ER trip. No. Nope.
I skipped doing that. Blending it into serum allowed me to apply it on my cheeks and other body parts. The feeling just wasn't identical though.
raw ghkcu powder ends up in skin serums and other topicals
I'm wondering about the meaning of cosmetic grade. The product in question lacks that specific label. Its analysis certificate indicates identical purity levels compared to other unofficial market sources I've come across. Still, I'm going to get it checked independently just in case.
Gotta be rage bait.
I'm thinking the same thing.
I should mention that items marked cosmetic quality work only when applied to the skin surface. It comes across as though further study is needed here or else an effort to provoke responses is underway. No hurry applies to any of this. Prior to getting more materials pause and look through all available details on these compounds along with handling methods like freeze drying steps and similar topics purely to protect well being.
After reviewing earlier comments it looks like this person also prepares their own sterile injection water. The whole thing recalls debates from my twenties about whipping up toothpaste at home to stretch a tight student budget. The steps are straightforward yet pointless and unneeded since nobody injects dental paste. In the end I steer clear of purifying and dividing my own starting powders like some underworld figure. Authentic freeze-dried form of the peptide stays reasonably priced.
I never claimed the item meets cosmetic standards. That idea came from another user higher up in the thread. Right now two analysis certificates sit here with me and their details line up closely. The first one came through an independent merchant on a major marketplace though I won't name it since the rules forbid that. The second belongs to an unofficial source and arrived inside a small container.
My role involves creating and running facilities for making medicines, which leaves me puzzled by your comment. On top of that, the word basically just describes freeze drying anyway.
People talk about a version meant for looks, yet that label is purely for promotion. We skip over it without a second thought. All it indicates is a lack of testing for safe use via needle. It could have excellent cleanliness without the sterilization process required for shots. Plus its usefulness stays minimal as it fails to cross into the lower skin layers.
The stuff packed into those little tubes isn't the same thing as what fills the oversized sacks, exactly like the opening comment pointed out.
Seems like your reply addresses a word that never appeared in my comment. Maybe this was meant for a different person instead?
Yeah that phrase doesn't seem to exist so they're likely mixed up about it. I was also planning to mail it away for more checks or run them myself since I can get at that sort of equipment.
True enough I guess. Must have been responding to the trollish remark and continued the exchange. Haha no hard feelings meant at all.
Hey buddy your opening comment mentioned checking out those massive sacks of ghkcu with all the laughing faces. Everyone follows along fine this whole exchange is aimed straight at that starting question about whether people were injecting the compound from oversized pouches.
The test document for beauty-grade material, sometimes labeled unprocessed, matches what comes with a freeze-dried container meant for shots. Yet the actual substances differ. If putting microbes and toxins straight into your body sounds fine, that's your call. As I noted already, look into how the cosmetic unprocessed type varies from the dried version.
I'm wondering what unique method the unofficial sellers follow to make their items safe for injecting.
I figure any kind of examination would apply to this item the same way it does for other things I send away. Besides, that word just means the material has gone through freeze drying. Doing it that way leaves the chemical makeup of the molecule alone.
I won't hand out every detail ready made. Everything needed for your own digging sits earlier in the thread. I also tossed in one extra keyword as a clue to get your search moving.
This must be an effort to spark fury on purpose. May you stay unharmed. Dashing straight over to hit the mute option.
Once more it looks like participants failed to separate these items in any way.
Does anybody around actually hold solid training in chemical processing or drug production fields? That could spark more useful exchanges now that the earlier thread has wandered off course.
I suspect you're after a chemist from around here. Some folks in the group could probably respond using images. By the way, Occam's razor means that with multiple ways to account for an event the easiest explanation tends to be best since it avoids extra complications and speculation.
Lots of those experts hang out here too and they'll jump in if they're interested. Look around the discussions to spot the chemistry experts and researchers since they're not hard to notice. Feel free to mention them in this thread for a possible reply. (Laughing because some buddies could get mentioned and I hope they're not upset since I'm just trying to have a laugh! 😂) Another choice involves your job at drug production sites allowing a chat with a colleague about it in theory only. Sensible members in this place aren't messing with bulk powders. Should you doubt what we say then good fortune to you.
Finding those requires some effort on my part, haha. By the way, I'm unclear on the term pinning raws. Regardless of having a pure certificate, I always run my materials through dual filtration steps. Is that the definition you're using for raw materials?
Figuring this stuff out falls entirely on you, not anyone else. Others shared details for you to look into, but you continue finding reasons to object. Learning that freeze drying process doesn't suddenly qualify you as a specialist in preparing peptides for shots. My job involves money management, yet that doesn't mean I create currency on my own.
Those oversized containers of material are normally just approved for beauty applications and not considered safe when injected. So there's clearly an important point being overlooked here.
I've kept nothing in the way at all. Folks really haven't offered anything useful up to now. I checked first and this exact point never came up or got talked about before.
Man this is irritating. How come I can't find any way to skip over these messages?
The label cosmetic grade carries no technical meaning at all. Those ready containers originate from large quantity purchases. I always run any item through a double filtration step before using it. Still this isn't the main issue here. The analysis certificates show identical findings anyway.
Everyone should stick with whatever feels right to them on this. Share how your own results turn out later if you decide to. Try the forum search features listed in my profile when looking for info gets tricky. Terms for unprocessed freeze-dried stuff turned up an early thread on the exact topic, which has popped up often in lots of places. Still, each person chooses their path. Has anybody gotten the basic powder form? I've checked into sources offering that material for way less. An amount like that per unit might cover over a dozen small bottles of similar size. A precise scale seems necessary at minimum for correct weighing, along with empty containers that have metal seals.
Curious if that one helpful poster from before is even still active here since he came across as the single person with anything worthwhile to add in the thread apparently.
I must say this conversation has grabbed my attention.
I tried selecting a member's username which took me straight to their personal page where I noticed the most recent activity timestamp if they permitted it through preferences. I explored the site for a while and discovered plenty of handy tools along with interesting material.
If you don't know the answer just say so. It's fine to admit it. After all some of you seemed to think freeze drying counted as sterilization or removing endotoxins, which is just...
No we did not. Plenty of threads already cover sterility testing, which would not be needed if anyone believed freeze drying made the product sterile. Seriously, if you're set on it then go ahead and inject the raw material. Or don't. We're not your doctors and you're clearly determined either way.
Some folks just can't be helped, SMH
He might need this reminder: I cannot picture showing up to a new group and complaining about the food and music while expecting personal service with drinks and snacks. The service here really sucks...
They grabbed the wrong book when they checked out:
Apologies for all the tags tonight but I think you'll get a kick out of this! @randompersonrandom
Bottom line is do not inject material that arrives in a large bag. No matter how pure the contents look the bag itself cannot stay sterile once opened. Adding water only makes the contamination risk worse. Members here stick to strict steps like leaving vials sealed and cold, checking the liquid through the glass, cleaning the stopper with 70 percent isopropyl before every use, and tossing the vial after a few days. Even with all that care contamination can still happen and make you seriously ill.
I have a bad feeling we'll see news stories this winter about folks ending up in the hospital after using this person's poorly made homemade version. He's clearly not going through all this effort just for himself.
This brew tastes incredible. Right now I'm letting out an odd sobbing chuckle. Look at all the usual nonsense unfolding around me.
Analogy time. These can help get a point across if that's really what you're after. Picture the bulk GHK bags as oral iron tablets and the freeze dried vials as IV iron. The tablets are made to be swallowed safely. If you crush them, mix with bac water and inject you'd get very sick because that's not how they're meant to be used. The IV version is made for injection. Trying to take it by mouth would also make you sick. Both aim to raise iron levels but through different routes and they are not interchangeable. Same idea applies to topical GHK powder versus the freeze dried injectable version. One is for skin absorption the other for injection. They are not the same. The analogy isn't perfect since I used an oral example instead of topical
If you have tried it, this topic is still open. Sign in to reply — it takes a minute.