Participants note that Chinese firms have large legitimate chemical operations and may shift between product types based on profit and risk. One view holds the article fairly describes a business move toward peptides. Others see little evidence of direct fentanyl contamination in peptides and compare risks to other imported goods.
What this discussion establishesWhether media coverage exaggerates contamination risks or presents a reasonable business account
Still openActual incidence of cross-contamination between product lines
Nothing here is advice.
This piece comes from the drug makers who are unable to jack up their prices by 2500 percent.
The country possesses a huge valid drug and chem production sector. Just because a peptide comes from there doesn't indicate much on its own regarding the maker's skill. You might be getting from a chain where the same firms handle various chemical types, some ok, some not approved, some tied to illegal drug making. Like all other pharma.
Plenty of nonsense articles around, but this feels reasonably balanced. It's a compelling industry tale. Firms find peptides bring higher profits and lower risks than Fentanyl, leading them to switch over. Another victory for peptides.
Anybody come across peptides containing fentanyl from a legitimate source? The idea worries me, though I've only seen vague mentions in the news.
Nope. There have been more infant formula fatalities in the country over the last four years than from peptides or even cheap vitamins, which also originate there incidentally.
That's unlikely to occur. The country produces the starting materials but not the final fentanyl itself.
A drug firm tainted eye drops using germs. Ring any bells?
If you have tried it, this topic is still open. Sign in to reply — it takes a minute.