CommunityFood & Appetite

Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month

28 replies19 peopleFeb 9, 2026☆ Follow
Summary

How will Discord's new age verification policy affect users and what are the privacy implications?

Users are reacting negatively to Discord's March rollout of teen-by-default accounts that require face scan or government ID for full features. Many plan to leave or limit use due to privacy risks, especially around data retention and potential tracking. Discussions note the policy stems from predator issues and upcoming regulations or IPO plans, with some users pointing to past data incidents and alternative platforms.

What this discussion establishesWhere people disagree

Whether the policy is mainly about child safety or primarily driven by business and regulatory motives; also whether end users of certain substances face future enforcement risk.

Still open

Exactly what non-teen content will be blocked for unverified accounts and how reliable the verification methods will prove in practice.

Nothing here is advice.

28 replies · 19 people
QuietAnchor73archiveopening postFeb 9

Starting in March every account gets a teen-appropriate experience by default. Full access will need a face scan or ID next month, so age verification applies to everyone.

CopperAlder51archiveFeb 9

Lately this service feels less worthwhile for my purposes. It mostly brings frustration instead of convenience. Any feature available there works fine on other communication tools or apps I already use, and I get the sense that's what the company intends.

GreyMarble12archiveFeb 9

I'll have to see what more knowledgeable folks say about it. I really don't like the thought of officials getting hold of this data later. Would that make it too simple for them to follow my buys of these items? And suppose they go after such things down the line?

CopperAlder51archiveFeb 9
↳ replying to @GreyMarble12

People claim these images or videos stay right here on the phone just to confirm age. Only if their word can be trusted though.

SharpAnchor92archiveFeb 9

Government demands aren't something that bothers me in this case, since I doubt they're forcing the service to implement it directly. Any site built around exchanging thoughts and viewpoints shouldn't have to confirm users' ages at all, except perhaps by having them accept the rules.

SlowBramble78archiveFeb 9

My hideous mug is bound to overload the whole network if they ever try to capture it again.

CopperAlder51archiveFeb 9
↳ replying to @SharpAnchor92

They're updating the rules so every account gets treated like it's underage now, after running into problems with shady users on some communities. Verification turns mandatory under the update, and skipping the step means getting labeled as a kid.

SlowBeacon94archiveFeb 9
↳ replying to @CopperAlder51

The reasoning seems sound at first glance yet without requiring an official identification scan there is no method to verify a person's years so young users will still get through.

SlowBeacon94archiveFeb 9
↳ replying to @SlowBeacon94

Forget what I said before. After going through that write-up it looks like official identification ends up being required. This setup doesn't sit right with me so I'm dropping the platform for gray. No interest in authorities keeping tabs on the whole thing.

CopperAlder51archiveFeb 9
↳ replying to @SlowBeacon94

According to what I've come across, the demand is for either a state-issued identification document or a personal video recording. I doubt that either approach is completely secure.

RustQuill44archiveFeb 9

Maybe the real issue is whether those in charge even notice if folks decide to go elsewhere. For my part there's no way I'm sending over any identification that could connect back to what I'm doing on that chat platform.

NorthMeadow39archiveFeb 9
↳ replying to @QuietAnchor73 (opening post)

Private chats along with unrestricted communities should keep operating without any change.

SharpAnchor92archiveFeb 9
↳ replying to @NorthMeadow39

You raise an interesting idea, especially around the unclear parts. From what I've noticed the service seems to treat only intimate material as meant for adults at the moment. Still I might have that mistaken.

CopperAlder51archiveFeb 9
↳ replying to @SharpAnchor92

Not quite. This is what you will lose access to.

SharpAnchor92archiveFeb 9
↳ replying to @CopperAlder51

The write-up fails to explain adult-oriented material. Apparently it suggests nothing beyond explicit photos counts. Inboxes seem set to grow messier for unconfirmed accounts. Rule number seven stands out as the only guideline section possibly touching unclear situations. Those below eighteen cannot take part in intimate acts or anything else on the app risking their virtual or actual security. The sole case mentioned involves taking justice into one's own hands. That leaves quite an expansive vague region concerning what counts as danger, almost certainly by design.

SteadyQuill55archiveFeb 9

I yearn for those earlier times on the old chat network in the skeptics discussion area where my equally restless teen companions and I would flood in using twisted copies of one guy's nickname and all blame the fakes while pleading with the operators to kick the intruder until he tired of the chaos and temporarily network banned the whole crew with a note to reflect alone on our behavior.

WryQuill22archiveFeb 9
↳ replying to @SteadyQuill55

It turns out that particular chat network hasn't disappeared after all. Due to worries about how they handle personal data I've avoided signing up for the popular messaging app and instead been slowly searching for options that are more spread out. Currently a pair of my acquaintances seem eager to look further into another open protocol.

QuietBramble77archiveFeb 9
↳ replying to @SteadyQuill55

Those old messaging platforms haven't vanished completely. It puzzles me that conversations regarding peps fail to occur in such locations. It appears groups would prove more resistant to being discontinued. However the drawback remains that all participants have their addresses revealed.

IronHarbour69archiveFeb 9

The real reason for this BS is the upcoming IPO filing.

BrightKettle28archiveFeb 10

Every single time officials claim their moves protect kids I spot the lie right away. Their goal is building records on how people act so they can grab more of our cash and limit choices about how to spend each day. Of course they act like they hold the right answers on what opinions or lifestyles count as proper. The same pattern shows up with medical coverage where the real worry is never our actual well-being. Screw them.

CopperAlder51archiveFeb 10
↳ replying to @IronHarbour69

Yeah, that and some regions are cracking down on them. But mostly that.

LevelLedger10archiveFeb 10
↳ replying to @CopperAlder51

They suffered a security incident that leaked personal details including official identification for seventy thousand users back in October right after launching in those regions.

IronWillow84archiveFeb 15

Discord holds zero appeal for me since it lacks any real protection compared to safer spots like the forum we're using now.

IronHarbour69archiveFeb 15

Oh, good: the age verification rollout has ties to a major investor known for surveillance architecture.

LevelSparrow75archiveFeb 16
↳ replying to @GreyMarble12

It's clear that rules will soon tighten around unregulated research compounds. What remains uncertain is the precise timing and whether individual buyers will also come under scrutiny besides distributors already facing pressure.

BrightKettle28archiveFeb 16
↳ replying to @LevelSparrow75

People worry that ordinary buyers might get singled out, but I doubt it. There's no basis in law for going after someone just because they want to improve how they feel. Sellers operating in this loosely regulated peptide scene are another matter entirely. Officials could restrict supply by focusing on raw materials and production sites, the way they handled steroids years ago. It's only my theory from watching similar patterns, since I've been following these trends for some time.

Add your experience

If you have tried it, this topic is still open. Sign in to reply — it takes a minute.

Discord will require a face scan or ID for full access next month · ZyraTrack Community