CommunityGear & Supplies

Niimbot advice for vial labels

33 replies21 peopleJun 25, 2026☆ Follow
Summary

best Niimbot model and label sizes for 3ml and 5ml vials

Users recommend the M2 for its features and label options like 40x20 for vial bodies and 28x14 rounds for tops, though some note the round tops are discontinued. Cheaper alternatives such as the D11 or D110 work well for basic black labels on vials without needing top rounds. A few suggest even simpler options like regular printers with Avery sheets, but report ink issues on thermal stock. Several mention the D110 as sufficient and easy for personal peptide labeling.

What this discussion establishesWhere people disagree

whether spending more on M2 or M3 is worth it versus sticking with cheap D110 for simple vial work

Still open

software compatibility problems on older Windows versions and sourcing compatible round top labels for D110

Nothing here is advice.

33 replies · 21 people
WarmAnchor46archiveopening postJun 25

My spouse is interested in getting one of those Nimbot units. Maybe the folks who know them well can suggest the best version along with suitable label dimensions for three milliliter and five milliliter containers. Appreciate any input.

GreyAlder96archiveJun 25

Previously the M2 ranked as the top pick overall. Sizes measuring 40x20 worked fine on vial labels while round ones measuring 28x14 suited the tops. These days the d11 option seems required for the tops since those round versions stopped being produced for the M2 or its related model.

RustBeacon82archiveJun 25

My M2 is great overall yet it bothers me they stopped including those small round stickers for the vial tops. Someone mentioned the forty by twenty size works on the three milliliter containers and for bigger stickers on the five milliliter ones the fifty by thirty option is available.

WarmAnchor46archiveJun 25

Wondering if a budget option exists that can handle printing labels for vials. The caps aren't something I need.

RustBeacon82archiveJun 25

Lots of folks decide on alternate units like those two so they can avoid being tied down to the maker's stickers because the devices only work with that company's own versions.

SlowLedger21archiveJun 25
↳ replying to @WarmAnchor46

I picked up this printer during a discount and it came with one roll of labels included. Mine has been performing well for my own needs when using basic labels. Take a look at this picture from my collection.

IronLedger45archiveJun 25

For basic label printing I find that model works nicely at three hundred dots per inch. More elaborate designs call for other series instead. Those seem excessive just for marking vials and pens unless the whole thing turns into a hobby.

SteadyQuill55archiveJun 25

Damn you people I went twelve months resisting that gadget I have zero use for since I'm on my own and tag my flasks properly yet you got me during an evening of fatigue plus mild restlessness so now it's arriving this Friday.

WarmAnchor46archiveJun 25
↳ replying to @SteadyQuill55

It's no use fighting the urge so I got the syringes in 5ML along with filters during my weak moment too.

SteadyQuill55archiveJun 25
↳ replying to @WarmAnchor46

Right after declaring I was finished toying with unneeded fresh compounds, I went and bought a set of the latest one anyway, announcing my buying rampage has finished.

PlainAlder11archiveJun 25
↳ replying to @SteadyQuill55

I ended up with two label printers after checking some online discussions. One takes care of my flat vial stickers while the other handles the circular tops. Those white circular tops had to come straight from the manufacturer itself.

LevelBeacon74archiveJun 25
↳ replying to @SteadyQuill55

It seems a cat shares your place. So that shows you're not by yourself at home. Haha

SteadyQuill55archiveJun 25
↳ replying to @LevelBeacon74

True, yet should one of those felines reach the deep freeze holding my peps, that would already signal greater difficulties.

WarmMeadow55archiveJun 26
↳ replying to @WarmAnchor46 (opening post)

I heard folks discuss getting dedicated machines for this task, but sheets sized for standard printers work fine instead. Their layout program lets you make the tags and run them through equipment already at home. I started with a basic version.

AmberSignal37archiveJun 26
↳ replying to @SlowLedger21

My original device handled everything fine. Eventually though I decided I wanted something more stylish so I purchased an upgraded model that cost more allowing me to produce labels larger by eight millimeters.

SlowLedger21archiveJun 26
↳ replying to @AmberSignal37

What are your thoughts on it up to now? I picked up the basic model simply because I needed one... though I could switch to a better version down the road as well. Stationery items appeal to me broadly, and the nicer versions might work well in additional tasks.

GreyPebble50archiveJun 26

Looking for labels in round top style that match the D110.

AmberSignal37archiveJun 26
↳ replying to @WarmMeadow55

I thought I'd test out that technique because I own an inkjet printer. Creating the labels resulted in the ink rubbing away immediately.

WarmMeadow55archiveJun 26

I figure those were heat sensitive stickers meant for some other printer model.

PlainAlder11archiveJun 26
↳ replying to @GreyPebble50

I ordered mine straight from the producer. I picked the white and colored kinds since the transparent ones stay invisible against dark tops. I bought three rolls on my own and they performed well.

NorthHarbour19archiveJun 26

I'm really fond of this unit. It seems like only the company's own stickers work with it. Can you confirm if that's true?

PatientBeacon15archiveJul 14
↳ replying to @AmberSignal37

After looking into the matter a bit, it turns out that toner from color laser printers holds up without smearing. Waterproof labels seem workable with them too. I'm hesitant about buying a fresh printer at the moment though. Perhaps running an inkjet and sealing the results with clear tape could be an option for me.

AmberBeacon41archiveJul 14

Wondering if it's a good buy.

BlueBramble39archiveJul 15
↳ replying to @AmberBeacon41

Although the d11 costs less and seems like a good deal, I ended up paying a little more for the m2 since it let me enjoy the process more and experiment in different ways.

AmberBeacon41archiveJul 15
↳ replying to @BlueBramble39

Appreciate the idea! Planning to check out the two choices. Still working on picking the better fit for me.

AmberSignal37archiveJul 15
↳ replying to @AmberBeacon41

For labeling my peptides just for myself, this printer works really well even though the tags are a little smaller and only come out in black.

IronKettle95archiveJul 15
↳ replying to @AmberBeacon41

I received my label maker in the mail the other day. After viewing a brief online guide I managed to create tags for every container in my set. It went really smoothly. When I pulled the containers from cold storage to mark them I first had to clean the surfaces because of moisture buildup. This thing performs great.

QuietBramble40archiveJul 15

I got an M3 that runs fine yet finding the label editing software download has me stuck. Suggestions for obtaining it would be great because my computer runs windows 8 which may be why it's not working.

KeenThistle61archiveJul 15

Budget options work better with the higher resolution version rather than the basic one for improved print quality. Larger creative projects benefit from the model designed for that purpose. A similar unit allows even wider media but it is pointless for vial use. It manages the forty by twenty and fifty by thirty formats. Vials won't require sizes exceeding those with the fifty by thirty reserved for five to ten milliliter and above containers.

CopperFenwick10archiveJul 15

I'm fond of my M2 overall. Its single drawback shows up now and then when the starting label lifts a bit and tears the ribbon.

RustQuill44archiveJul 15
↳ replying to @RustBeacon82

This has always puzzled me. If it's not part of some work routine, even a small stack of those stickers ought to go on for ages. Probably the power source inside the device fails first, way before all the stickers are used up.

ClearSignal22archiveJul 16
↳ replying to @AmberBeacon41

They suit me perfectly. The fifteen by thirty millimeter size is what I go with. The reduced dimensions let me view a greater portion of the container's interior. That way I notice any particles or unwanted elements floating around.

RustBeacon82archiveJul 16
↳ replying to @RustQuill44

I've got more than three hundred containers already, which means the stickers for those containers, their tops, and updating the markings on the injectors really pile up quickly. Besides that, plenty of folks apply them to mark all sorts of things beyond just the compounds. Mine gets put to work creating tags for cables while I'm updating the wiring on my vessel. Others find them handy for keeping things sorted. There are many applications for such a device when you consider it.

Add your experience

If you have tried it, this topic is still open. Sign in to reply — it takes a minute.