NorthBramble57

It's obvious the real aim here is to shield drug company earnings rather than look after anyone's well-being.

Thanks for the suggestion. I considered splitting with others, but differing schedules would complicate timing. I may still try it, especia…

That is a fair observation; companies see little benefit in studying this area.

After weighing the options, smaller kits appear simpler for my situation. Working around the large size adds too many steps. My main worry …

That matches the approach I had in mind: mix the large vial, divide portions into smaller ones, and freeze them, thawing one as needed. I s…

That clarifies things. When I first arrived here I assumed the one-month guideline referred to potency loss rather than general sterility r…

After calculating the yearly difference between the two kit sizes it came to only a modest amount, so the savings are smaller than the perc…

Thawing and refreezing after every use is the exact opposite of what I've been told to avoid. Reading through this place feels a lot like s…

I try to be cautious overall, though saving money still pulls at me. Appreciate the input anyway.

That advice differs from other things I have read, which is why I keep second-guessing myself. In another reply I mentioned seeing four wee…

The uncertainty for me is knowing exactly when a vial becomes too old to trust. Most places mention about a month as the cutoff. Infection …

I noticed larger kits cost less per milligram than smaller ones. At my current weekly amount I would finish a big reconstituted vial well p…

I'd like the same information. I want to purchase larger 60mg kits because smaller sizes cost more per amount. I could mix the big one and …