↳ replying to @NorthThistle87 (opening post)
Neither option for me. COAs matter mainly for fill volume. My risk tolerance sits higher than most.
Both, always.
How many people actually...?
Summary
What this discussion establishesDo people test or filter their peptides before injecting
- Filtering is viewed as quick and low-effort for pen users
- Risk tolerance varies widely and is treated as a personal choice
- Some avoid sharing habits to prevent judgment
- A minority say they never filter or test any lyophilized product
Whether filtering or testing is necessary when COAs are available and whether visible particles justify filtering versus discarding the vial
Still openHow many users actually test or filter versus how many stay silent about skipping both
Nothing here is advice.
27 replies · 20 people
Skipping filters with pens looks odd unless you think they do nothing. With a cart the only added steps are swapping the needle for a filter and then a fresh needle.
I hope this is just curiosity. Our answers should not influence your choice and the sample is tiny anyway. Research it yourself and decide what feels safe to you.
Test only if a group is available. Filter yes, because I split the reconstituted material between a pen vial and a syringe vial for my wife.
↳ replying to @RustHarbour10
Most threads here come from curiosity. Comments are anecdotal rather than scientific and people like hearing what others do or any research they found. We are mostly in unknown territory. It is interesting that replies mostly come from lower-post-count users. Testing and filtering feel like personal choices some may avoid discussing to dodge judgment either way. Like boxers or briefs. I will say I wear boxers but I am less open about my testing or filtering habits.
As already noted, with a pen it seems pointless not to filter. The tiny 34g needles basically act as a second filter anyway.
↳ replying to @RustHarbour10
Well your name checks out.
I have said it before and will again. I just grip it and rip it and let my body handle the filtering. I live on the edge, punk rocker style.
↳ replying to @WarmMeadow92
Until boxer briefs came along. Game changer. I wonder why some stay quiet about filtering. I skip it mainly because I have never filtered other lyophilized products. We used to run other solutions through 0.22um syringe filters but that was different.
Going out on a limb with a clear stance here: against any checks from solid sources, always supporting filtration, those snug undershorts, and yes to that fruit topping on the pie 😛
↳ replying to @BlueAlder12
I should have said boxer briefs. I have worn them for years and they are the best. My testing and filtering approach is not really a secret, it is just more nuanced than a simple yes or no. Benefits of filtering seem unclear in some situations and it comes down to personal risk tolerance. Same with testing. I suspect far less testing and filtering happens than we think. There are a few vocal grip-it-and-rip-it voices but the actual number who skip both is probably higher and they just stay quiet.
Neither. Testing from Australia looked expensive, risky and a hassle. I do not have much cash to spare. I recently saw mention of a possible local testing source but have no idea how legit it is. If these were IV injections then skipping a filter would be crazy, but hopefully no one is doing that with peptides. For subQ I have a reasonably working immune system even while on an immune-suppressing drug. I see no major risk from occasional bacteria, a bit of endotoxin, some peptide fragments or a small clump. Any problem would show up clearly under the skin. Maybe not filtering raises the chance of immune reactions to the peptides if impurities act as adjuvants.
Test no. A reliable COA is enough. Filter only if I see particles, though in that case it should probably be tossed, but my ignorance runs deep.
↳ replying to @WarmMeadow92
Bro you have to try the Old Navy boxer briefs. Four years now. Love them.
↳ replying to @ClearHarbour45
I have a mall trip planned tomorrow morning so I will stop by Old Navy and check them out. Thanks for the tip.
↳ replying to @WarmMeadow92
They must have nylon or polyester woven in because they do not stretch out and get baggy like cotton. Keeps things supported and the look firm. I have had this pair on twenty-six days straight and they still fit like they just came out of the dryer.
When I pin store-bought stuff, no and no. When I pin other stuff, no and no. Squatches do not wear any undies, you dig?
Add your experience
If you have tried it, this topic is still open. Sign in to reply — it takes a minute.